I walked into the theatre to watch Lootera, ready to be wildly irritated by Sonakshi Sinha in a Son of Sardaar/Rowdy Rathore-esque
reprise and a wretched mess of a story. The thing about being such a
judgmental movie-watcher, however, is that you run the chance of being
pleasantly surprised every once in a while.
It’s 1954. In a fictitious Bengali town of Manikpur, an evening of
entertainment is interrupted when the local zamindar’s (Barun Chanda)
daughter, Pakhi (Sonakshi Sinha), has a terrible coughing fit. She’s
rushed to her room—which takes ages because their house is so big—given a
shot of medicine and waited on by her doting father, who sits by her
side fanning her till she wakes up again, recovered.
He then tells her a story of a king who was indestructible because he
hid his life in a parrot. So long as nothing happened to that parrot,
no one could touch him. But when the parrot was found and killed,
(spoiler alert) the king died as well. Pakhi is his parrot, the zamindar
tells his daughter. The quiet intensity of this story (much more
enjoyable when you don’t have to read the abridged version in a movie
review), sets the tone for the film.
Enter Varun (Ranveer Singh), an archaeologist who comes seeking the
zamindar’s permission to excavate in Manikpur because he suspects there
may be an ancient civilisation below. Not only is he given permission to
excavate the hell out of their premises, but also welcomed to stay in
the zamindar’s house. So he moves in with a friend and colleague
(Vikrant Massey).
Vintage Ranveer Singh is gorgeous. Pakhi thinks so too. Somewhere
between stolen glances, whispers, art classes and asthma attacks, the
pair fall in love. This bit is especially lovely. As they observe each
other from afar, too shy at first to make any obvious moves, you in the
audience get involved too: staring at a door too long, waiting for Varun
to walk in, or him to look up at Pankhi when her eyes are boring into
his face (be warned, she does this a lot).
There isn’t really anything substantial that happens to warrant an
intense relationship, but you’re willing to let this pass because
everything on screen looks so arty, old world and beautiful that you
don’t want to ruin it for yourself.
But all this is the obvious calm before the storm. A little into the
second half, those familiar with O Henry’s short story (one of my
personal favourites) The Last Leaf, will work out how the film ends.
Those who are not, get to enjoy Lootera on an extra level. But
this is the also the bit where the film—which started slowly, languidly,
with no apparent rush to get caught up in any drama—starts to falter,
trip into loopholes, and give you enough reason to question the basis of
this particular couple’s love for each other.
Lootera is a quiet love story, more passionate in its
whispers and silences than when the cleverest dialogue is uttered. The
silence and subtlety hang around through the film, whether we’re
watching our lead pair falling in love, fighting, or seeing our hero
smack in the middle of a chase sequence across town. Surprisingly
restrained and effective performances by Sinha (finally,
congratulations), Singh (yay!) and the supporting cast, great sets,
beautiful cinematography and near-perfect sound design (hello again,
Amit Trivedi) all work to make a strong case for your continued patience
to stay with the film till the end, even if it does take its own sweet
time to come around (and even if it may have slightly tainted one of
your favourite O. Henry stories).
Is it more lasting and evolved than Motwane’s Udaan? This I have yet
to decide. In the mean while, make a trip to the theatre; it may not be
epic, but it’s definitely worth a watch.
Source: http://to.ly/mgOq
Home »
entertainment
» Movie review: Lootera may not be epic, but it’s worth a watch
Movie review: Lootera may not be epic, but it’s worth a watch
Written By Unknown on July 6, 2013 | 7/06/2013
Labels:
entertainment